Policies on Conflict of Interest, Human and Animal rights
Policies on Conflict of Interest
Journal submissions are assigned to editors to minimize potential conflicts of interest. The following relationships between editors and authors are considered conflicts and are avoided: Current colleagues, recent colleagues, recent co-authors, and doctoral students for which Editor served as committee chair. After papers are assigned, individual editors must inform the managing Editor of any conflicts not included in the list above. If none of the editors satisfy all of the conflict screens, co-editors who are least conflicted will be assigned to the manuscript. In addition, co-editors who are least conflicted are assigned to all paper submissions by sitting editors. Journal submissions are also assigned to referees to minimize conflicts of interest. After papers are assigned, referees are asked to inform the Editor of any conflicts.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted per the ethical standards, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should be asked to indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed. Authors must declare that the procedures followed were under the ethical standards of the responsible human experimentation committee and by the World Medical Association and the Singapore Declaration. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954607/